Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0812011205x5105590cr76a6ec54cfaf4913@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
Responses Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
List pgsql-general
Tree view


On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html

All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under the heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for anyone involved in selecting a database.

well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step ahead in that regard. 
Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)

--
GJ

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"