Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date
Msg-id 1228163199.6675.65.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"  ("Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 20:05 +0000, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford
> <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
>         http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html
>
>         All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down
>         under the heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" -
>         must-read for anyone involved in selecting a database.
>
>
> well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How
> reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a
> step ahead in that regard.

Depends on your needs, a broken step is worse than a manual one.

Joshua D. Drake


> Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)
>
> --
> GJ
--
PostgreSQL
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"