Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort
Date
Msg-id 2ee95a25-2cba-c661-4aa5-66ce518f047b@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

On 2021/07/28 6:25, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 27/07/2021 19:49, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Anyway I attached the patch that changes only xact_redo_abort()
>> so that it calls XLogFlush() to update min recovery point.
> 
> Looks good to me, thanks! FWIW, I used the attached script to reproduce this.

Thanks for the review!

Barring any objection, I will commit the patch and
back-patch it to all supported versions.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: 回复：Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce the number of special cases to build contrib modules on windows