Hi,
On 12/29/18 10:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21/12/2018 11:12, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
>> Here is a patch that passes the -j option from pg_upgrade down to
>> vacuumdb if supported.
>
> It's not clear to me that that is what is usually wanted.
>
> The point of the post-upgrade analyze script is specifically to do the
> analyze in a gentle fashion. Mixing in parallelism would seem to defeat
> that a bit.
>
Well, that really depends. The user passed -j to pg_upgrade in order for
the upgrade to happen faster, so maybe they would expect, as I would,
that the ANALYZE phase would happen in parallel too.
At least there should be a "notice" about what the script will do in
this case.
Best regards,
Jesper
