Re: some unused parameters cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: some unused parameters cleanup
Date
Msg-id 2bd11d40-1e66-9162-2078-1a993bb9df47@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: some unused parameters cleanup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: some unused parameters cleanup  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: some unused parameters cleanup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-08-25 18:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Here is a series of patches to remove some unused function parameters.
>> In each case, the need for them was removed by some other code changes
>> over time but the unusedness was not noticed.  I have included a
>> reference to when they became unused in each case.
> 
> For some of these, there's an argument for keeping the unused parameter
> for consistency with sibling functions that do use it.  Not sure how
> important that is, though.

I had meant to exclude cases like this from this patch set.  If you see 
a case like this in *this* patch set, please point it out.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer