Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Date | |
Msg-id | 2bannjzfokeyxex33525q3fuygbwz24tbugtg4ydsh3hongd47@wu3hn7rwhmd2 Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-04-07 18:38:19 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 07.04.25 16:43, Andres Freund wrote: > > There recently was a breakage of building with PG on macos with meson, due to > > the meson folks implementing a feature request to move away from using > > bundles, as > > 1) bundles apparently aren't supported on iOS > > 2) there apparently aren't any restrictions left that require using bundles, > > and there haven't been for a while. > > > > They've now reverted these changes, due to the postgres build failures that > > caused as well as recognizing they probably moved too fast, but the iOS > > portion seems like it could be relevant for us? > > Um, interesting. AFAICT, the change you mention was reverted from the 1.7 > branch because it was accidentally backpatched, but it remains in master. I think the plan is to either redesign it in master or to revert it. > (For those just catching up: > > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/14240 > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/14340 > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/commit/fa3f7e10b47d1f2f438f216f6c44f56076a01bfc > ) > > Overall, this seems like a good idea, as it removes a historical > platform-specific particularity. (I found a historical analysis at > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2339679/>.) > > But it does break existing users that add -bundle_loader, because > -bundle_loader only works with -bundle and is rejected with -dynamiclib. Seems hard to imagine that somebody would inject -bundle_loader separately from src/makefiles/Makefile.darwin? > To test, I patched the makefiles to use -dynamiclib instead of -bundle, > which also required removing -bundle_loader, and it also required adding > -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup. This built correctly and generally worked. > > But then you also run into a new variant of this issue: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1o4HOv-001Oyi-5n@gemulon.postgresql.org > > Because there is no -bundle_loader, the symbol search order appears to be > different, and so hash_search() gets found in the OS library first. > > So this is all going to be a mess at some point sooner or later. :-( Yikes, that is depressing / scary. I wonder if we ought to rename our hash_search with some macro magic or such regardless of using -bundle or not. > > Afaict this library doesn't have unresolved symbols, due to just linking to > > libpq. So I don't think we really need this to be a shared module? > > Apart from the hard distinction on macOS, in terms of the build system, the > distinction between "library" and "module" is mainly whether the resulting > library gets a soname, version symlinks, and what directory it is installed > in, so in that sense the discussion so far indicates that it should be a > module. I don't think that happens if you don't specify a soname etc. And we'd need to adjust the install dir either way, I think? > I suppose on macOS we could link it like a library and install it > like a module, but that would effectively create a third category, and I > don't see why that would be worth it. I think there are postgres clients for iphone, not sure if they use libpq. Today libpq might actually cross-build successfully for iOS [1]. But if we use shared_module() that won't be the case for libpq-oauth. Anyway, I don't have a strong position on this, I just wanted to bring it up for consideration. Greetings, Andres Freund [1] I couldn't immediately quickly figure out how to install additional SDKs on the commandline on macos an then gave up before attaching a monitor to my mac mini.
pgsql-hackers by date: