Problems with pg_upgrade. - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Bror Jonsson |
---|---|
Subject | Problems with pg_upgrade. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 2B69ABB0-014A-4296-8D34-D2E83A84FA77@gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Problems with pg_upgrade.
|
List | pgsql-general |
Dear all, I’m trying to upgrade from 9.0 to 9.2 with out any success. the pg_upgrade script fails with the message Old and new clusterinstall users have different values for pg_authid.oid: geo-route-in:~ bror$ /opt/local//lib/postgresql92/bin/pg_upgrade -b /opt/local//lib/postgresql90/bin/ -B /opt/local//lib/postgresql92/bin/-d /Volumes/ruoteRAID/db/postgresql90/defaultdb/ -D /Volumes/ruoteRAID/db/postgresql92/defaultdb/-u bror Performing Consistency Checks ----------------------------- Checking current, bin, and data directories ok Checking cluster versions ok Checking database user is a superuser ok Checking for prepared transactions ok Checking for reg* system OID user data types ok Checking for contrib/isn with bigint-passing mismatch ok Creating catalog dump ok Checking for presence of required libraries ok Checking database user is a superuser ok Old and new cluster install users have different values for pg_authid.oid. Failure, exiting The only information about this error I could find in in the source code: > https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/master/contrib/pg_upgrade/check.c … /* * We don't restore our own user, so both clusters must match have * matching install-user oids. */ if (old_cluster.install_role_oid != new_cluster.install_role_oid) pg_fatal("Old and new cluster install users have different values for pg_authid.oid.\n"); /* * We only allow the install user in the new cluster because other defined * users might match users defined in the old cluster and generate an * error during pg_dump restore. */ if (new_cluster.role_count != 1) pg_fatal("Only the install user can be defined in the new cluster.\n"); check_for_prepared_transactions(&new_cluster); } … pg_authid in the old db looks as follows: bror=# SELECT * FROM pg_authid; rolname | rolsuper | rolinherit | rolcreaterole | rolcreatedb | rolcatupdate | rolcanlogin | rolconnlimit | rolpassword| rolvaliduntil ----------+----------+------------+---------------+-------------+--------------+-------------+--------------+-------------+--------------- postgres | t | t | t | t | t | t | -1 | | bror | t | t | t | t | t | t | -1 | | django | f | t | f | f | f | t | -1 | | (3 rows) And in the new one: SELECT * FROM pg_authid; rolname | rolsuper | rolinherit | rolcreaterole | rolcreatedb | rolcatupdate | rolcanlogin | rolreplication | rolconnlimit| rolpassword | rolvaliduntil ---------+----------+------------+---------------+-------------+--------------+-------------+----------------+--------------+-------------+--------------- bror | t | t | t | t | t | t | t | -1 | | (1 row) Any suggestion for how to fix this? Many thanks! /Bror Jonsson
pgsql-general by date: