Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: named parameters in SQL functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: named parameters in SQL functions
Date
Msg-id 29845.1258340753@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: named parameters in SQL functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: named parameters in SQL functions
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't see why it would need to be a reserved word.  We're not
> changing how it gets parsed, just what it means.  At any rate
> "FUNCTION." is a 9-character prefix, which is rather longer than I
> would prefer.

This from the guy who likes 40-character function names?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: named parameters in SQL functions
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: named parameters in SQL functions