Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1
Date
Msg-id 29695.1132252169@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1  ("Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at>)
Responses Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1  (Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes:
> It's the '-l' option (list all databases) that does not honor the database 
> given on the command line.
> This does not work, if the postgres database is dropped in 8.1:

> psql -l template1

It does seem a bit inconsistent that psql wouldn't connect to the
specified database in order to do -l, if one is specified.
Anyone want to look and see if it's easy to change?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1