Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)
Date
Msg-id 29664.1332338389@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> ... although none of the issues alone is a show-stopper, but considering 
> all these things together, I'm starting to feel that this needs to be 
> pushed to 9.3. Thoughts?

Agreed.  In particular, I think you are right that it'd be prudent to
simplify the WAL-location arithmetic and then rebase this code onto
that.  And since no code at all has been written for the arithmetic
change, I think we have to consider that it's not 9.2 material.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema