Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From torikoshia
Subject Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
Date
Msg-id 293cf2c14c149cb333dd30ae39e08e4e@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall  (Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023-10-31 00:26, Alexander Kukushkin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 08:50, torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I have very minor questions on the regression tests mainly regarding
>> the
>> consistency with other tests for pg_rewind:
> 
> Please find attached a new version of the patch. It addresses all your
> comments.

Thanks for updating the patch!

> +extern void preserve_file(char *filepath);

Is this necessary?
This function was defined in older version patch, but no longer seems to 
exist.

+# We use "perl -e 'exit(1)'" as a alternative to "false", because the 
last one
'a' should be 'an'?


-- 
Regards,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA Group Corporation



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: race condition in pg_class
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade