Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4
Date
Msg-id 29335.1505339624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Indeed that seems plausible. I guess something like the attached should
> fix the issue?

Ah, I see you came to the same conclusion I did.  But see comment
about adding a comment.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] uninterruptible state in 10beta4
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables