Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Uh, why only back to 8.2?
> Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now anyway"...
Yeah, but they will each have a final release. Don't we want to have
the updated info in the final releases? I don't care about the
incidental CVS mentions, but replacing cvs.sgml with that new chapter
seems worth the trouble.
> BTW, there are a ton of conflicts backpatching each step.
Welcome to the fun of back-patching. Did you get any leverage from
cherry-picking, or did it seem to be just as stupid as plain "patch"?
regards, tom lane
