Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible
Date
Msg-id 29242.1578670290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> So, I think v10 is a version of patch, which can be committed after
> some cleanup.  And we can try doing better nulls handling in a separate
> patch.

The cfbot reports that this doesn't pass regression testing.
I haven't looked into why not.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing parallel make of libpq
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR