Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Did we ever fix this?
We agreed what to do: add padding field(s) to struct AclItem and
add an Assert() somewhere that would check that sizeof(AclItem) is 8,
while leaving the bulk of the code using sizeof(AclItem) rather than
a #define constant.
But it doesn't look like it got done yet.
regards, tom lane
>>>>> grant/revoke does not work in NetBSD/m68k. This is due to the wrong
>>>>> assumption that sizeof(AclItem) is equal to 8 in all platforms. I am
>>>>> going to fix this by replacing all occurrence of sizeof(AclItem) to
>>>>> ACLITEM_SIZE (newly defined as 8 in catalog/pg_type.h). See included
>>>>> patches. If there's no objection, I will commit them. Comments?
>>>>
>>>> I do not like this patch at *all*. Why is sizeof(AclItem) not the
>>>> correct thing to use?
>>
>> In NetBSD/m68k sizeof(AclItem) = 6, not 8.
>>
>>>> Replacing it with a hardwired "8" seems like
>>>> a step backwards --- not to mention a direct contradiction of what
>>>> you claim the patch is doing.
>>
>> It's already hard wired in pg_type.h, isn't it.
>>
>>>> Perhaps the real problem is that the AclItem struct definition needs
>>>> modification? Or maybe we need a way to put a machine-dependent size
>>>> into the pg_type entry for type aclitem? The latter seems like a
>>>> good thing to be able to do on general principles.
>>
>> Glad to hear you have better idea. Anyway, NetBSD/m68k users need some
>> way to fix the problem now, since the problem seems very serious.
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
