Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?
Date
Msg-id 28827.1491423143@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?  (Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com> writes:
> I have written a patch to fix these macro definitions across src/ and contrib/.
> Find the patch, attached.  All regression tests pass on my Mac laptop.

Thanks for doing the legwork on that.  This seems a bit late for v10,
especially since it's only cosmetic, but please put it in the first
v11 commitfest.

> I don't find any inappropriate uses of _P where _PP would be called for.  I do,
> however, notice that some datatypes' functions are written to use PG_GETARG_*_P
> where PG_GETARG_*_PP might be more efficient.

Yeah.  I think Noah did some work in that direction already, but I don't
believe he claimed to have caught everything.  Feel free to push further.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?