Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Changing the unit setting would also be a behavioral change. �I think
>> what Bruce is suggesting is that this is simply not worth worrying about
>> in the back branches.
> It seems pretty strange not to at least document it. And I'm not wild
> about adding documentation that says "Even though this value purports
> to be in kilobytes, it's really not", but I guess we can.
Uh, no, the suggestion is to do *nothing* in the back branches. Yes
they're buggy, but without any field complaints, it's hard to argue that
anyone much cares. And I agree with Greg Smith that for anyone who does
care, a behavioral change in a minor release is much harder to deal with
than a change at a major release.
regards, tom lane
