Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date
Msg-id 284D8239-200F-4942-98D9-8FBD06A4C5A2@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 3 Jun 2021, at 23:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> I wonder if we should use SSL/TLS in more places in our documentation.
>
> No objection to doing that in the docs; I'm just questioning
> switching the code-visible names.

As long as it's still searchable by "SSL", "TLS" and "SSL/TLS" and not just the
latter.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments
Next
From: Isaac Morland
Date:
Subject: Re: DELETE CASCADE