Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-10-30 09:26:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't this complaining about the main shm segment, not a DSM extension?
> Don't think so, that has a ":" in the name.
If it *isn't* about the main memory segment, what the hell are we doing
creating random addon segments during bootstrap? None of the DSM code
should even get control at this point, IMO.
regards, tom lane
