Re: Re: Replace MSSQL by PostgreSQL ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Replace MSSQL by PostgreSQL ?
Date
Msg-id 28279.992740618@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Re: Replace MSSQL by PostgreSQL ?  (100.179370@germanynet.de (Martin Jacobs))
Responses Re: Re: Replace MSSQL by PostgreSQL ?  (100.179370@germanynet.de (Martin Jacobs))
List pgsql-general
100.179370@germanynet.de (Martin Jacobs) writes:
> If you don't need type 'name' do
>     DROP TYPE name;

This would be an exceedingly bad idea, since 'name' is used throughout
the system catalogs.

It might work to rename the type (eg, "update pg_type set typname =
'pgname' where typname = 'name').  Haven't tried that to see what
sorts of problems it might have.  Would definitely recommend doing
any experimentation of this sort in a scratch database ;-)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Keith F Irwin
Date:
Subject: Re: Unable to --rebuild postgresql-7.1.2-4PGDG.src.rpm
Next
From: David Ford
Date:
Subject: Re: sysauth-pgsql / pam-pgsql port(s) ...