Re: why does this not give a syntax error? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: why does this not give a syntax error?
Date
Msg-id 28276.1370892154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why does this not give a syntax error?  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>)
List pgsql-general
Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> writes:
> On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "11825657and" is not any more lexically ambiguous than "11825657+".
>> It has to be two separate tokens, and that's how it's read.

> But it's not read correctly.

[ shrug... ]  Works for me.  You want to put together a self-contained
test case showing differently?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: why does this not give a syntax error?
Next
From: Sajeev Mayandi
Date:
Subject: updatable view