Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Date
Msg-id 28246.1203958211@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Is there any currently supported platform which
>>> does not have uint64?
>>
>> I don't know, and neither do you.

> Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info out of a
> compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to output the value of
> INT64_IS_BUSTED?

We know all the buildfarm machines have working int64, because they'd
fail the bigint regression test if not.  That's not the point here.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes