On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:50:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Is there any currently supported platform which does not have
> >>> uint64?
> >>
> >> I don't know, and neither do you.
>
> > Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info
> > out of a compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to
> > output the value of INT64_IS_BUSTED?
>
> We know all the buildfarm machines have working int64, because
> they'd fail the bigint regression test if not. That's not the point
> here.
If we don't have buildfarm coverage for machines where INT64_IS_BUSTED,
how do we know we support those architectures at all?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
