Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> --On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 15:39:54 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>=20
> wrote:
>> At this point I'd settle for saying that --enable-thread-safety on
>> Unixware will generate a library that requires -Kpthread. This is
>> kinda grungy but it seems that any more-pleasant solution would
>> require a disproportionate amount of work.
> If I did the work for the dlsym() stuff would you and the rest of core@
> accept it?
How invasive a change are we talking about? I'd be inclined to reject a
patch that makes libpq materially less readable ...
regards, tom lane
