Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > Ah, okay. I'll remove gistscancache() then, as this seems to be dead > code. Certainly none of the other index types have a concept of caching the previous tuple like that. I agree, zap it. regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных