Re: NoMovementScanDirection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: NoMovementScanDirection
Date
Msg-id 1099883066.22609.46.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to NoMovementScanDirection  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: NoMovementScanDirection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 13:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> However execMain.c uses NoMovementScanDirection to denote "do nothing",
> and so es_direction will never have this value at runtime.

Ah, okay. I'll remove gistscancache() then, as this seems to be dead
code.

> Not sure if it's worth factoring the enum type into two (or more?)
> types to distinguish these shades of meaning.

IMHO it would be worth doing.

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Romanian translation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NoMovementScanDirection