Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
Date
Msg-id 27320.1153407284@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)  (Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at>)
Responses Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)  ("Adrian Maier" <adrian.maier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at> writes:
> BTW: HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 is defined, so INT64_IS_BUSTED is defined also.

You sure?  INT64_IS_BUSTED should *not* be set in that case --- it's
only supposed to be set if we couldn't find any 64-bit-int type at all.

As for the regression test failure, it's odd because it looks to me that
the actual test output is an exact match to the default "float8.out"
file.  I'm not sure why pg_regress chose to report a diff against 
float8-small-is-zero.out instead.  This may be another teething pain
of the new pg_regress-in-C code --- could you trace through it and see
what's happening?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress bar updates
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: Units in postgresql.conf