"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Applied with revisions --- mostly, supporting configure-time control
>> over whether pass-by-value is used.
> Do we need buildfarm coverage of these options?
Wouldn't hurt, I guess, though it's not very urgent since the
non-default cases were default up till these patches.
Note that we are already exercising both ends of the
float8-byval option, so probably only --disable-float4-byval
is very interesting to test explicitly.
regards, tom lane
