Re: Some restructuring of the download section - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Some restructuring of the download section
Date
Msg-id 27201.1339951215@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some restructuring of the download section  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: Some restructuring of the download section
List pgsql-www
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Uh, that part is just incorrect. Several sets of platform packages
>> certainly do initdb for you. And AFAIK every single one of them on
>> Linux at least do service setup for you.

> Hmm, clearly it's been a while since I did a PG installation on Debian
> (oddly!), as that does seem to leave the server up and running. I'm
> fairly certain it didn't in the past.
> RPMs on the other hand, do not.

FWIW, Red-Hat-based systems have a strong distro policy against starting
servers merely because the package got installed --- the theory is that
an "everything" install should not leave the user running a bunch of
servers he doesn't know about and maybe hasn't configured securely.

I'm a bit surprised to hear that Debian does it differently; although
it's possible that they distinguish manual from automatic install
scenarios.  It's a little bit saner to do an auto service start if you
know that the user explicitly requested this specific package.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section