Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications
Date
Msg-id 26b22098-4dc6-6517-49a5-766e3443002f@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/11/17 21:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I imagine that pg_dump -s would be the basic operation that users
>> would do first before creating a subcription on a secondary node, but
>> what I find surprising is that publications are dumped by default. I
>> don't find confusing that those are actually included by default to be
>> consistent with the way subcriptions are handled, what I find
>> confusing is that there are no options to not dump them, and no
>> options to bypass their restore.
>>
>> So, any opinions about having pg_dump/pg_restore --no-publications?
> 
> And that's really a boring patch, giving the attached.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neha Khatri
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication
Next
From: "K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Crash observed during the start of the Postgres process