Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> a log message that it was skipped.
I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully. It would
make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
doesn't support CRL.
regards, tom lane