Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> > a log message that it was skipped.
>
> I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
> silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
> also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully. It would
> make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
> doesn't support CRL.
Why hard-code something if we can dynamically report it, and NetBSD 2.0
isn't that old.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +