Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date
Msg-id 26667.1297553873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Feb 12, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm.  I think we'd still have to disallow dash as the first or last
>> character in a version name to make that unambiguous.  Not sure it's
>> worth the trouble.

> How likely is *that*?

Not very, but the rules are getting a bit complicated ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling