Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date
Msg-id 2376E872-9F13-46E6-BD2D-4D236F640387@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Feb 12, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> How likely is *that*?
> 
> Not very, but the rules are getting a bit complicated ...

Doesn't seem complicated to me:

1. Use -- to separate extension name, old version, new version
2. Don't use - at the beginning or end of name or version number
3. Profit

How hard is that?

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage