Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation
Date
Msg-id 26555.1158423844@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> ISTM the right answer is to add xml_is_well_formed() in this release
> and have xml_valid as an alias for it, with documentation explaining
> that xml_valid is deprecated and will be removed in the next release.

Not hearing any objection, I've done this.

> His patch also adds an xpath_array() function --- what do people
> think about that?  It's well past feature freeze ... now we've always
> been laxer about contrib than the core code, but still I'm inclined
> to say that that function should wait for 8.3.

I didn't add xpath_array(), but am still open to doing it if there
is any consensus in favor of it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing data type space usage
Next
From: Gevik Babakhani
Date:
Subject: index help for uuid datatype