Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id 26515.1112630501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> ... If there are no license or build issues I'm in favor.

Peter has pointed out that the problem of circular dependencies is a
showstopper for integrating plPHP.  The build order has to be
    Postgres
    PHP (since its existing DB support requires Postgres to build)
    plPHP
so putting #1 and #3 into the same package is a no go.  Which is too
bad, but I see no good way around it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas F.O'Connell
Date:
Subject: Re: Recovering real disk space
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?