Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id 200504041556.29798.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday 04 April 2005 12:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > ... If there are no license or build issues I'm in favor.
>
> Peter has pointed out that the problem of circular dependencies is a
> showstopper for integrating plPHP.  The build order has to be
>  Postgres
>  PHP (since its existing DB support requires Postgres to build)
>  plPHP
> so putting #1 and #3 into the same package is a no go.  Which is too
> bad, but I see no good way around it.
>

AFAICT Peter's claim is false.  You can install plphp in the order of PHP,
PostgreSQL,plPHP  which is the same for all of the other pl's.

You don't need postgresql installed before php any more than you need it
installed for perl (although you do need postgresql installed to compile some
of the perl & php db interfaces, but that is all after the fact.)

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: _RollbackFunc : dead code?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?