Re: spinlock contention - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: spinlock contention
Date
Msg-id 26418.1310134901@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: spinlock contention  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Responses Re: spinlock contention
Re: spinlock contention
List pgsql-hackers
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> Patch attached.

> Beware that it needs at least GCC 4.1, otherwise it'll use a per-partition
> spin lock instead of "locked xadd" to increment the shared counters.

That's already sufficient reason to reject the patch.  Not everyone
uses gcc, let alone very recent versions of gcc.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust OLDSERXID_MAX_PAGE based on BLCKSZ.