Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date
Msg-id 26351.1586039074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 11:51 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> I've translated the non-vote comments into estimated votes of -0.3, -0.6,
>> -0.4, +0.5, and -0.3.  Hence, I revoke the plan to back-patch.

> FWIW, I also think that it would be better not to back-patch.

FWIW, I also concur with not back-patching; the risk/reward ratio
does not look favorable.  Maybe later.

> Last but not least, I would like to join with others in expressing my
> thanks to you for your hard work on this problem.

+1 on that, too.

Shouldn't the CF entry get closed?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests and contemporaneous buildfarm failures
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?