Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date
Msg-id 20200404223212.GC3442685@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 06:24:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't the CF entry get closed?

Once the buildfarm is clean for a day, sure.  The buildfarm has already
revealed a missing perl2host call.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?