Re: pg_execute_from_file review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Date
Msg-id 26332.1291047178@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_execute_from_file review  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Re: pg_execute_from_file review
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I'm not sure why you need either "from". It just seems like a noise 
> word. Maybe we could use pg_execute_query_file() and 
> pg_execute_query_string(), which would be fairly clear and nicely 
> symmetrical.

+1, but I think "query" is also a noise word here.
Why not just "pg_execute_file" and "pg_execute_string"?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: directory archive format for pg_dump
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file review