Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql
Date
Msg-id 26232.1220740372@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The principle of least astonishment suggests that \ef should behave in
>>> the same way as \e.
>> 
>> Quite.

> So, are they consistent now or do we need another patch?

They are consistent, I just don't like either of them ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing statistics write overhead
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: About that CommitFest redirect page ...