Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql
Date
Msg-id 200809062119.m86LJKH19203@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> ... I changed
> >> the exit code to PSQL_CMD_NEWEDIT instead of PSQL_CMD_SEND, which causes
> >> the command to wait in the query buffer.
> 
> > The principle of least astonishment suggests that \ef should behave in
> > the same way as \e.
> 
> Quite.

So, are they consistent now or do we need another patch?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: About that CommitFest redirect page ...
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing statistics write overhead