Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | MauMau |
---|---|
Subject | Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter |
Date | |
Msg-id | 2598E90D3D534989905115C5C1172679@maumau Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Responses |
Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Bruce san, From: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:09:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yes. I don't see any reason to change it, either, as nobody has >> complained that it's actually bad. If you feel a compulsion to >> change the docs, do that. > > OK, seems 'Postgres' is a unique output format for 'date' too, even though > it doesn't look like the 'Postgres' timestamp output: > > default > SET datestyle = 'ISO, MDY'; SELECT current_timestamp, current_date; > SET > now | date > -------------------------------+------------ > 2013-08-06 16:18:48.218555-04 | 2013-08-06 > > SET datestyle = 'SQL, MDY'; SELECT current_timestamp, current_date; > SET > now | date > --------------------------------+------------ > 08/06/2013 16:18:43.054488 EDT | 08/06/2013 > > SET datestyle = 'German, MDY'; SELECT current_timestamp, current_date; > SET > now | date > --------------------------------+------------ > 06.08.2013 16:18:59.026553 EDT | 06.08.2013 > > MDY > SET datestyle = 'Postgres, MDY'; SELECT current_timestamp, current_date; > SET > now | date > -------------------------------------+------------ > Tue Aug 06 16:18:53.590548 2013 EDT | 08-06-2013 > > DMY > SET datestyle = 'Postgres, DMY'; SELECT current_timestamp, current_date; > SET > now | date > -------------------------------------+------------ > Tue 06 Aug 16:20:23.902549 2013 EDT | 06-08-2013 > > I don't think there is even a documentation change I can suggest. I'm sorry I didn't respond for a long time. I've come up with a suggestion. The original reporter of this problem expected the output of the date type in 'Postgres,DMY' style to be "17 Dec 1997", when the output of the timestamp if "Wed 17 Dec 07:37:16 1997 PST". He thought so by reading the following sentence: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-datetime.html The output of the date and time types is of course only the date or time part in accordance with the given examples. However, the actual output of the date type in Postgres style is: * 12-17-1997 if datestyle is 'Postgres,YMD' or 'Postgres,MDY' * 17-12-1997 if datestyle is 'Postgres,DMY' So, my suggestion is to just add the following sentence right after the above one. The Postgres style is an exception: the output of the date type is either MM-DD-YYYY (e.g. 12-17-1997) or DD-MM-YYYY (e.g. 17-12-1997), which is different from the date part of the output of the timestamp type. Could you consider and add this to the manual? Regards MauMau
pgsql-hackers by date: