Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE
Date
Msg-id 2588005.1674621464@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE
Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Patches attached.

+1 for 0001.  I'm still nervous about 0002.  However, maybe the
cases that we had trouble with are legacy issues that nobody cares
about anymore in 2023.  We can always look for another answer if
we get complaints, I guess.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Next
From: mahendrakar s
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER