Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE
Date
Msg-id 20230125085223.iu6vmn7ornq3x34f@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2023-01-24 23:37:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Patches attached.
> 
> +1 for 0001.

Cool, will push tomorrow.


> I'm still nervous about 0002.  However, maybe the cases that we had trouble
> with are legacy issues that nobody cares about anymore in 2023.  We can
> always look for another answer if we get complaints, I guess.

Yea, it's a patch that should be easily revertable, if it comes to that. I'll
add a note to the commit message about potentially needing to do that if
there's not easily addressed fallout.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: old_snapshot_threshold bottleneck on replica
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: to_hex() for negative inputs