Re: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH]
Date
Msg-id 25811.1263104840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH]  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think it would help if you could split this up into about 6 to 10
>> single-feature patches.

> ... having to handle 6 to 10 patches all hitting the same body of code 
> doesn't sound terrible pleasant either.

Indeed.  That sounds like rather a mess.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: win32 socket definition
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: damage control mode