Re: win32 socket definition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: win32 socket definition
Date
Msg-id 25748.1263104630@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: win32 socket definition  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: win32 socket definition  (James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 22:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Can't think of one, but you could try grepping for the socket-related
>> syscalls to see what variables are referenced there.

> Found two more by going over it again that way.

> Unless there are objections, I will apply this version tomorrow.

There's another copy of ListenSocket[] in the BackendParameters struct.
I also wonder about postmaster.c's habit of using -1 for empty slots
in ListenSocket ... how safe is that for Win64?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c - updated
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH]