Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug?
Date
Msg-id 2580.985654854@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
"Joe Shevland" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au> writes:
> Semi-topical I hope ;)

Completely irrelevant to JDBC as far as I can see.  I've redirected to
pghackers.

> NOTICE:  Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/115: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> ...
> NOTICE:  Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6087: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE:  Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6111: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE:  Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6112: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE:  Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6136: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE:  Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6137: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
>         This probably means the backend terminated abnormally
>         before or while processing the request.

Ugh.  It looks like something has clobbered your pg_attribute file.
Was this the first sign of trouble?  Can you provide an "od -x" dump of
that file?  (It'd be $PGDATA/base/DB2OID/1249; you'll need to look in
pg_database to determine the OID of db2.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms