Re: Re: Call for platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date
Msg-id 2549.985654424@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Call for platforms  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: Re: Call for platforms  (Peter Bierman <bierman@apple.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> "PPC750"?  What's that?  "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
>> to onlookers ...

> Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
> follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my
> pov, using an accepted label, rather than a marketing (re)label, better
> indicates *what* this actually can run on. I'm not sure that I have it
> labeled correctly yet, but "G3" is not a step in the right direction.

I found an apparently current "PowerPC CPU Summary" at
http://e-www.motorola.com/webapp/sps/technology/tech_tutorial.jsp?catId=M943030621280

If accurate, the chip in this PowerBook is *not* a 750, since that tops
out at 400 MHz.  Apple offered this model in 400 and 500 MHz speeds,
which makes it either a 7400 or 7410 chip ...

> Should I put "Mac G3" in the comment section?

Yes, if you won't put it where it should be ;-).  I'm still of the
opinion that "G3" will mean something to a vastly larger population
than "750" or "7400" would.  The latter are "marketing relabels" too
you know; Motorola's internal designation would probably be something
else entirely.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug?